The history of Rome and the West would have changed drastically if Julius Caesar had not been murdered.
First off, the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire were both ended by Caesar’s assassination in 44 BC. He probably would have kept building up his power and creating a powerful centralised government if he hadn’t been slain. This might have changed the direction of Western history by resulting in the establishment of an empire with Caesar as its ruler.
The evolution of Roman law and government would have been altered by Caesar’s rule continuing. Caesar was renowned for his reforms, which included establishing the Julian calendar and developing a new calendar. He probably would have carried out more reforms that would have changed the Roman Empire’s legal and political structures if he hadn’t been assassinated.
The trajectory of Roman military growth would have been affected by Caesar’s authority continuing. The Roman Empire rapidly grew under Caesar’s direction, annexing lands in Gaul, Britain, and Egypt. He probably would have kept expanding the empire’s sphere of influence if he hadn’t been killed, which would have changed the direction of Western history.
Continued Caesarian authority would have an effect on religion as well. Caesar is renowned for his cult of personality creation and religious reforms. He probably would have kept using religion as a means of establishing his dominance if he hadn’t been killed.
The evolution of the Roman language and culture would have been altered by Caesar’s rule continuing. Caesar was a prolific writer, and the literature and culture of the West have greatly benefited from his works. He probably would have kept writing and advancing Roman language and culture if he hadn’t been killed.
Overall, the history of Rome and the West would have changed drastically if Julius Caesar had not been slain.